In order for the highest quality
production we needed to know what the audience thought was good about the
production and what needed to be improved, the result being an improved final
piece. We created a focus group of seven
people who viewed our preliminary production. After we asked a series of
questions based on what they saw from our preliminary.
·
The first part of feedback we received said “they
really liked the lip syncing we did with the first section of the video, it
fitted the soundtrack well and wasn't out of time” This was vital in our
progression because this is an aspect of editing we want to keep in our main
production.
· The next piece of feedback we received said “we
really kept close to the narrative in the actual video of ‘if I were a boy’ and
presented it nearly exactly the same with very similar locations.”
·
The next piece of feedback we received said “although we kept very similar locations
in our preliminary to the actual video , we only used our school for the
locations and when it comes to our actual we really needed to reach further
afield to get a wide variety of different locations.”
·
The next piece of feedback said “the quality of
the video and how the start and end of the video had good quality but the
middle contained parts where the quality was poor. “ This was down to the use
of a phone to film the preliminary and not a proper camera –.we really wanted
to improve on the equipment we used when we began filming for our main
production. We decided to use a DSLR
camera to film along with a tripod ensuring better quality footage making it
look more professional.
·
The last piece of feedback said “really liked
the actors we chose in the preliminary .Kelsey and Kuziva really fitted the
roles well and gave emotion in their pieces. From this feedback we saw that Kuziva
was very popular with the audience and that he puts quite a lot of emotion and
emphasis into his performance, this gave us the idea to use him in our main
production to get the same emotional effect and emphasis seen in the prelim
Esasay
Throughout our research, planning
and production we have utilised many research methods such as; focus groups,
social media sites, Vox Pops and online questionnaires to obtain audience
feedback on the our planning and productions. We received feedback on our
preliminary tasks; research on the music genre; our initial ideas on the music
video; layouts of ancillaries, raw footage; rough edit, final ancillaries and
final production. The audience feedback we obtained on these sections was vital
to the success of our productions because they told us what was good about the
productions, what the best layout to use for the ancillaries were, what to improve
on which would make our production better and what needed to be improved upon
on the various production pieces .The audience feedback we received was for the
preliminary task. For the preliminary task we had to recreate the first 40
seconds of a known artist/band’s music promo. We decided to recreate BeyoncĂ©’s
‘If I were a boy’.
In order for the highest quality
production we needed to know what the audience thought was good about the
production and what needed to be improved, the result being an improved final
piece. We created a focus group of seven
people who viewed our preliminary production. After we asked a series of
questions based on what they saw from our preliminary.
·
The first part of feedback we received said “they
really liked the lip syncing we did with the first section of the video, it
fitted the soundtrack well and wasn’t out of time” This was vital in our
progression because this is an aspect of editing we want to keep in our main
production.
·
The next piece of feedback we received said “we
really kept close to the narrative in the actual video of ‘if I were a boy’ and
presented it nearly exactly the same with very similar locations.”
·
The next piece of feedback we received said “although we kept very similar locations
in our preliminary to the actual video , we only used our school for the
locations and when it comes to our actual we really needed to reach further
afield to get a wide variety of different locations.”
·
The next piece of feedback said “the quality of
the video and how the start and end of the video had good quality but the
middle contained parts where the quality was poor. “ This was down to the use
of a phone to film the preliminary and not a proper camera –.we really wanted
to improve on the equipment we used when we began filming for our main
production. We decided to use a DSLR
camera to film along with a tripod ensuring better quality footage making it
look more professional.
·
The last piece of feedback said “really liked
the actors we chose in the preliminary .Kelsey and Kuziva really fitted the
roles well and gave emotion in their pieces. From this feedback we saw that Kuziva
was very popular with the audience and that he puts quite a lot of emotion and
emphasis into his performance, this gave us the idea to use him in our main
production to get the same emotional effect and emphasis seen in the prelim
We also received feedback for our
research about the genre of the band we had chosen. We devised a few questions we would ask
people, varying in gender and age. We
staged a Vox Pop which is a video that shows the public answering questions on
a topic, this is filmed in public to give the notion that the questionnaire is
random giving us the most unbiased responses.
The rules of vox pops:
The person that is being
interviewed needs to be on the right side of the screen and needs to be looking
towards the interviewer who is on their left. Each time an interviewee is first
mentioned their name, age and occupation should appear at the bottom of the
screen. Lastly they should be filmed in a busy place for a sense of realism.
We interviewed 10
people; 5 boys 5 girls to get a good variety of people and therefore unbiased answers.
The questions we were proposing to the interviewees were open ended question
about music videos. They were open so we could get their developed opinions and
not only closed yes or no’ answers.
The questions asked, the
people’s responses and an analysis of their answers:
First question:
What
is favourite genre of music video?
Kuziva:
R&B
Georgia
Allman: Pop
Aaron
Bailey: Funk-Rock
Becky
Boyfield: Indie/Alternative
Eve
Hilliam-Cooke: Pop
Mrs
Kaur: Indie, Rock and alternative
Sam
Hargrave: Hip Hop
Chelsey
Hibbins: Pop
Abi
Brown: Indie
Tom
Branch: Rock
From these
answers we can see that the majority of the people questioned favoured the pop
genre or the indie genre, this was useful when it came to produce our main
production because although even though we were producing a funk rock video we
could also use some pop and indie genre conventions in the video to get a wider
target audience and exhibit a wider range of media skills
Second
Question:
What
do you like to see in music videos?
Kuziva
Mutisi: Nice performance and something that's memorable
Georgia
Allman: Something that's eye-catching and has a nice performance
Aaron
Bailey: Something that's eye-catching, nothing all the same as that's a bit
boring
Becky
Boyfield: A good story line and a good performance by the artist
Eve
Hilliam- Cooke: Eye-catching
Mrs Kaur:
Something abstract so it has a bit of nature and a bit of performance, seeing
the artists so that I can feel like I can get to know them
Sam
Hargrave: A few editing techniques
Chelsey
Hibbins: A lot of dancing
Abi
Brown: Stories being told
Tom
Branch: I like to see all band members and their instruments
From
these answers it is clear that one of the main elements the audience look for
in a music videos is a video with good actors, good performance and very eye
catching. This was extremely good information because once we began planning and
producing our final video we were able to figure out who our strongest actor
was in our group to get the ‘good actor’ and ‘good performance’ section of
feedback. We were able to work on making our video very interesting to watch
and grab the attention of anyone which led us to the discover the split screen
editing
Question 3
What
style of music videos do you like? Narrative or performance?
Kuziva
Mutisi: Performance
Georgia
Allman: Something that's colourful and bold and performance
Aaron
Bailey: Performance
Becky
Boyfield: Illustration and narrative
Eve
Hilliam- Cooke: Narrative
Mrs
Kaur: Bit of both but instead of narrative something more abstract
Sam
Hargrave: Fast pace with a bit of narrative
Chelsey
Hibbins: Narrative
Abi
Brown: Narrative
Tom
Branch: Fast paced with lots of noise, quite loud and performance
From
these results we can clearly see that there is a mixed bag of opinions between
performance and narrative – this was good feedback as when it came to producing
our main video we made sure to keep elements of both with the main actor
(Kuziva) doing performance in the form of miming the lyrics and also him
showing narrative as he walks through many locations – this making sure we get
a mixture of both – appealing to all the people questioned.
Question 4
Where
do you watch music videos?
Kuziva
Mutisi: YouTube and TV
Georgia
Allman: Spotify or YouTube
Aaron
Bailey: YouTube or Sound cloud
Becky
Boyfield: YouTube
Eve
Hilliam- Cooke: YouTube
Mrs
Kaur: YouTube
Sam
Hargrave: YouTube
Chelsey
Hibbins: YouTube
Abi
Brown: YouTube
Tom
Branch: YouTube
The
results gave us excellent feedback to see what kind of platform the audience
use to watch music videos. This information is helpful because we should use it
in our final production.
Question 5
What
pace should a music video be? Fast, medium or slow paced?
Kuziva
Mutisi: Like all three
Georgia
Allman: Any depending on the song
Aaron
Bailey: Medium pace
Becky
Boyfield: Medium pace
Eve
Hilliam- Cooke: Medium pace
Mrs Kaur:
Depends on the song, so if it’s a slow song a variety of edits but slow paced
edits, and if it’s a fast paced song then fast paced editing
Sam
Hargrave: Fast pace
Chelsey
Hibbins: Fast pace
Abi Brown: Fast pace
Tom
Branch: Fast pace and it’s got to have a good beat
These
results were very beneficial for our production; we can see that there is a
mixture of answers. The answers are
mainly between fast paced and medium paced videos which helps us in our production.
Question 6
What
do you think are the most important conventions for your favourite genre?
Kuziva
Mutisi: A good vocal performance
Georgia
Allman: Something that's eye-catching and memorable
Aaron
Bailey: Something that eye-catching and gets your attention all the way through
Becky
Boyfield: For it to be down to earth and for it to have a good
acoustic guitar
Eve
Hilliam- Cooke: Memorable
Mrs
Kaur: Cutting to the beat so ensuring that it’s edited well, having
a mixture of performance and abstract narrative, seeing the artist and having
some sort of fun element to it
Sam
Hargrave: Bit of narrative
Chelsey
Hibbins: Some illustration
Abi
Brown: Illustration
Tom
Branch: A good performance
The
main result we got from this question is that people want something that is
extremely memorable and eye catching for the audience. This means the audience
will be entertained throughout the music videos. Good actors and instruments
were also highlighted in the answers to make the music video more realistic
while also containing a good narrative.
The
next place where we got audience feedback is when we first voiced our idea for
narrative and performance in our video – this was done in our pitch video that
can be seen below:
We were able to turn our
pitch into a focus group to get the class’ opinion on our initial ideas of our
music video and ancillary tasks. After the pitch we asked what the group though
of the ideas.
Responses
·
The first piece of
feedback that we received was they liked our idea of having a mix between
performance and narrative and how that would give the audience the best viewing
experience especially in the genre we chose. They also liked the idea of the music video being narrative based compared
to the typical Funk Rock performance
music video because they thought the narrative we came up with (Having a
journey of Kuziva being shown and how he turns from ‘depressed’/’sad’ persona
to his ‘superstar’) . The audience especially liked our idea of continuous
walking throughout the video to fully emphasise the narrative. The walking parts
in different locations were influenced by; Coldplay’s ‘Scientist’ and the verve
‘bittersweet symphony’.
·
They also liked our idea
of slowing the pace of editing because it aided the narrative. This would allow the narrative to develop instead
of fast paced editing styles. Although the song is a funk-rock song and is supposed
to be quite fast paced however upon listening to the song it seemed the band
actually subverted the typical fasted paced sound of the genre and created a
much slower paced song.
·
The audience also liked
the idea of having Kuziva being shown in multiple locations and the idea of
having graphic matches used as transitions between locations however the
audience raised concerns that we wouldn’t get a wide enough range of locations.
They also raised concerns of whether we would be able to successfully execute
the graphic matches. With this feedback we made sure that we were going to get
a wide range of locations by travelling to multiple places when location
scouting. We scouted several locations from cities (Peterborough), to towns
(Bourne) and then to much more rural areas like fields.
·
The audience liked our
idea to use Kuziva as the main artist in the video as they felt he was the
strongest performer in the group and thought he was the person who would give
the best emotional performance to link the transition between sad and happy
narrative.
We also got audience
feedback on our ancillary planning which were sketches on different designs and
layout for the posters. For both the ancillaries we used a programme called
‘poll everywhere’ which is an online questionnaire system what allows people to
text in to vote on a set of pictures or even comment on a set of pictures. For our ancillary tasks we did two different
polls, one for the poster designs we made and another for the CD Digi pack
designed, both asking for what design they liked more. ‘Poll Everywhere’ allowed us to see what
designs were most popular so we could then use those designs to actually make
our ancillaries
The first design on the
poll was a close up shot of Kuziva but to have the picture split into two
different sections but still in a graphic match; one on the right having Kuziva
in the ‘depressed’, ‘sad’ persona in his scruffy clothes and on the left having
him as the stylish, superstar persona in his smart superstar clothing. This creates synergy with our music promo
because it is showing both personas. And then to have the title of the band at
the top of the poster and the song near to the bottom. After the poll it this
initial design had the lowest votes, which wasn’t a surprise because most
posters of this genre had a full body picture and other things such as star
ratings and logos of well-known music distributes such as ITunes and Amazon
. We came up with the second idea which is a full body shot having the same
split in two theme to continue the synergetic link with the actual promo and
leave extra space for aspects such as the main band name and the title of the
song. Having star ratings towards the bottom and having logos of different
music distributers as part of the design gave the poster a more realistic look
because it contains more of the conventions seen in music promo posters .However
this design didn’t obtain the most votes this is because although it contains a
much more professional design it didn’t have a the funk-rock style posters
should have and only didn’t have a synergetic link. So we then came up with the
third and most voted design, this design contains all the conventions of music
promo posters seen in the second design giving it the professional look but .This
theme is a newspaper theme, this idea for the newspaper theme was inspired from
this gig poster
It really sets out all the music promo poster
conventions really well in a cool funky style, just what we wanted and it also
linked in well with our newspaper transitions used in our main promo video-
this adding more synergy to the ancillaries rather than just having the split
picture (there is a more in depth justification on why we used this in an
earlier question) this theme really excited us, so I drew up the design in the
third picture and the audience loved it with a massive 12 votes. After
experimenting with the newspaper theme the final ancillary I came up with was
this:
Then we had another pol
for our other ancillary; the six panel digi pack and for this Digi pack we
created two different designs and put them into the pol everywhere system so
that the audience could vote on which they preferred (just like the poster) and
the pol can be seen below:
The first design was our
first initial idea of what we wanted to include in our six panel digi pack,
this had the same idea of having the split picture on the main panel (bottom
right) but that is all the synergy that we had in it – the other panels were
just based on CD Digi pack conventions so didn’t really have a theme, we
already knew before putting into the pol that this wasn’t our strongest design
as there really needed to be more synergy between it, the poster and the music
promo itself (this is the main feedback we got for this first ancillary design
and as you can see that was reflected in the votes). The second design did
much, much better; with having the feedback on the first design being that it
was quite poor and needed more synergy we set on designing a much more
synergetic design and we had a great idea just to use the same newspaper design
that was seen in the promo, then in the poster design we did – So on the first
main panel we had the same newspaper front page design that is similar to the
poster but this time we had a much closer up shot of Kuziva split into the two
personas (having that section of synergy too) and then for the rest of the
panels we made the design look like sub-articles in a newspaper with fake
article interlocked into CD Digi pack conventions such as ‘about the band’ and
‘lyrics’ sections made out to look like articles so it kept the newspaper
themes running through- this idea was extremely successful with the audience as
it got 15 votes and the feedback we got on it said it created that funky theme
synergy of the newspaper with the other two productions – something that the
first design didn’t really have. After getting this feedback we knew this was
the design we wanted to go for, so I set to work editing it up on Photoshop and
this was the result:
After the layout for
ancillaries’ feedback, the next section we got feedback on was some of our
actual production (promo video) and on our raw footage: For our main production
we were given two days to film our whole/the majority of it and then the3 next
time we came into school the first thing we had to do was show our raw footage
to our media teachers to find out their feedback on it and their opinion on the
footage; what was good and what maybe wasn’t so good. So below will be a list
of the different feedback we got:
·
The first piece of
feedback we got for our raw footage is that it was good we got A LOT of footage, not only just of the
main lip syncing but we got a varied amount of different shots in many
different locations (the one thing the audience were worried about most when we
did the initial pitch). They liked how we got multiple angles on all the
different main shots so that we could change up the angle in the editing
process to give the video more interesting shots and not only a singular shot.
·
They liked how we not
only got video footage for our main music promo but we also got multiple
location camera shot for our ancillaries – this being good organisation as they
are ready for the production of our ancillaries.
·
Another piece of
feedback we got was that although we got quite a lot of shots (what was good)
there were a few shots that seemed very blurry and shaky, this may stop the
professional look in our final piece – we thought we would put them in our
rough edit just so that we could get a feel for what the video would look like
finished and also try and correct the blurriness and shakiness by sharpening
the quality and stabilizing the videos – although this helped out a little bit
it still looked a bit weird so we then made the decision to re-film certain
bits of the footage, remembering to use the tripod to keep it steady and to
make sure we kept the camera on auto focus to get sharper looking footage.
Moreover, the next
pieces of feedback we got was on our rough first edit and for this we did
another Vox pop and also we got some written feedback from our media teacher
what both can be seen bellow. But firstly we have the Vox pops we did:
For this Vox pop we got
a group of four to watch our first edit and asked them a series of questions
and these where: What do you like about our music video? What do you think
could be improved? Do you think the graphic match is effective? Do you think
the start of the video is too boring? And do you like the split screen?
Here is an analysis of
their responses:
Question one) the first
piece of feedback we got was from Becky, she said that she really like the
style of editing we were going for (mainly the split screen) as it makes the
video very interesting – she also liked the choice of costume we used for
Kuziva as it match up with our narrative. The next piece of feedback was from
Ross and he also commented on the split screen editing we did, he said it was
really good and effective. Kyle then went on to say that he liked the walking
animations with the horizontal split screens. Calum then went on to say that he
like the cutting to the beat sections and how they went well with the song, and
he liked the pace of editing.
Question two) the first
piece of improvement feedback we got was from Becky, and this was to firstly
make sure that everything cut to the beat properly and that the black
spaces/gaps should be filled up with footage (this was actually due to us
losing footage – so when we came to editing our actual video we made sure we
had all the correct footage to go in the right places), the next piece of
feedback was from ross and he said we needed to work on our lip syncing a bit
more as some parts were a little out of sync (this something we strived to do
in our main production so that it looked professional). The next piece of
improvement feedback we got was from Kyle and he commented on the quality of
the actual footage and how it was particularly the best (this something we
defiantly noticed in our rough edit – this came down to the fact on some
recordings we forgot to change the camera back to auto-focus after manually
focusing for some ancillary photo shoots – this making the quality of footage
go down quite a bit – so much so from the rough edit we decided to re-film
certain bits of the production too get a much higher quality of footage).
Question three) All in
all for this question we got a very good positive feedback on the graphic
matches used I the rough edit and especially the one where Kuziva jumps over
the railing to the land into a field location – this was good feedback as the
graphic matches were one of the main issues people thought we were going to
struggle with – so it was good to know we were using them effectively.
Question four) for this
question the main response was that yes it was a little boring; especially the
start of the song and not so much the middle of the song. It was said that it
needed to be more interesting as the shots at the start they couldn’t really
see the point of them, they were just random shots of locations with nothing
happening in them and they also said that they needed to cut to the beat a bit
more and the pace needed to be increased. (This something we definitely wanted to
change for when it came to our main productions as when we watched it back it
did seem very boring – this was pretty major as we wanted to keep audiences
attentions but at the moment we wasn’t so as we had to re-film some things
anyway we thought it would be a good opportunity to re-film the start to make
it more interesting and for it to contain something to do with the narrative so
we filmed shots of Kuziva getting dressed into his scruffy clothing and also
filmed him putting on his boots and start to walk –all these done in split
screens to make it more enjoyable to watch as it gave the audience something to
watch all of the time with multiple focus points (and it had already been
recognised that split screens were really good.
Question
five) for this question there was a huge positive response on the split
screens- they though it was a really good addition to the editing style as it
gave the fun/qwerty style to the video that a funk-rock song should have and it
makes the video way more interesting as there is more things going on for the
audience to engage in and enjoy.
Below
this we can see a picture of what our media teachers thought about our rough
edit:
Within
this picture and writing the same kind of positives were talked about such as:
they really like the split screen idea, they like the costume choice between
the two personas of Kuziva as it shows the narrative and links to the narrative
very well, they liked the choice of actor as Kuziva gave a lot of passion and
enthusiasm to the role and was really good at lip syncing also, they loved the
graphic match and wanted more (in which we did add more when we implement the
newspaper transition idea influenced by the snatch opening – having a newspaper
as a main object that can be used as a graphic match from one location to the
other – the newspaper a great idea as it links with the narrative and it gave
us excellent ideas for our ancillaries). But they also picked up on the same
kind of negative that the people in the Vox pops pointed out too; how the lip
syncing was a little off (in which we corrected in the main production), how
the start of the whole video was quite boring and didn’t really have any point
of being there and that we should re-film this (in which we did to a much
better opening that actually related to the narrative and had more of a split
screen idea), they also picked up on the quality of the actual footage and
hinted to us that it was probably because of the camera being on manual focus
when it should have been on auto-focus and they also said to re-film to get a
much more professional looking video – in which we actually did a lot of
re-filming to get much better shots and quality – this resulted in a better
video we definitely though had improved and we were much happier with.
And
lastly we have the final pieces of production that we got audience feedback on and
this was the finished ancillaries and finished main video production. The first
one I’m going to look at is the feedback from the finished ancillaries and to
obtain this audience feedback we decided to use a social network called
Facebook; I uploaded pictures of both the magazine poster and CD Digi-pack and
asked if anyone would kindly give us feedback and an image of this can be seen
below:
Already from just
posting this on Facebook, hundreds of people were able to look at and critique
our two ancillary productions; Facebook allows its users to ‘like’, ‘comment
on’ and ‘share’ the post – this excellent for finding out if the ancillaries
where liked and to see what peoples opinion of them were in the comment
section. Straight away we got a big response of people ‘liking’ the post – this
meaning they liked them and thought they were good – so this was already an
indication that our ancillaries were pretty good as it got sixteen likes (has
got more now as this was a little while ago). After seeing that it got quite a
few like I then noticed that a few comments were coming through with feedback
and this can be seen below:
From these comments we
were able to find out people’s opinions on the actual ancillaries as they
posted them in the comments section below the pictures. All in all we got an
excellent response as they were practically all positive. We had people
commenting on it looking very professional, people loving the newspaper idea
and how it really works to create a band image and the synergy between all the
ancillaries was really good and worked well synergising with the promo. They
liked how we kept conventions of posters and digi-packs but also commented on
how setting them in a newspaper theme was a really good idea as it looks very
professional and eye-catching. There weren’t really any bad points so we took
this as really good compliments and we felt very proud of what we had produced.
And lastly, we have
our final piece of feedback and this was collected on the website ‘YouTube’,
what was the platform in which we wanted to exhibit our final production as we
had found out in our earlier research vox pops this is where most the target
audience would be able to see it and would prefer to see it. Once we finished our music video we received a comment on our video on YouTube. we decided to place on a public site in order to receive feedback from the general public. We got some positive feedback shown in the first sentence when it says they really liked our video. They then go on to say how they enjoyed the cutting to the beat and that it worked out really well. They went on to say that our costume choices were good and that they thought that our editing was good. They then finished with saying our lip syncing was good, which suggests that we chose the right actor to be in our music video. This feedback was very important because it gave us a clear indication of how the public felt about our music video and if it rivaled that of an actual music video. overall the feedback is essential in making our overall judgment of the success of the music video.


